| Laws and Policies: International Framework around Trafficking in Persons |
International Framework around Trafficking in Persons
|
|
ASEAN Member States and the International Legal Framework around Trafficking in Persons
|
International Framework around Trafficking in Persons |
| There are a number of international treaties and conventions, as well as other less formal statements of international law (soft law), which oblige states to act to prevent human trafficking, protect its victims and prosecute the perpetrators. Some of these treaties are specific to trafficking. Others, while not focused uniquely on trafficking in persons, have provisions which apply to trafficking either directly or indirectly. Finally there are international treaties which protect human rights or regulate international cooperation. These treaties have an indirect impact on the international legal framework prohibiting trafficking in persons. |
|
| Treaties Specific to Trafficking in Persons |
| International |
| The United Nations Convention against Transnational Organised Crime is the parent Convention to the UN Trafficking Protocol and must be ratified before a State can become a party to the Trafficking Protocol. The Convention includes specific obligations that apply to the crime of trafficking when committed in the context of transnational organised crime. State Parties have certain obligations relating to the criminalisation of trafficking, sharing information, mutual legal assistance, witness protection and extradition. (pdf) |
| The Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and Children, Supplementing the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organised Crime obliges State Parties to criminalise and prevent trafficking, to assist victims of trafficking and to cooperate with other States in combating trafficking. (pdf) |
| |
^ Back to top
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
|
|
| Treaties that Refer to Trafficking in Persons |
| |
^ Back to top
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
|
|
| Treaties that Relate Indirectly to Trafficking in Persons |
| |
^ Back to top
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
|
|
| Non-treaty Instruments and Documents that Relate to Trafficking in Persons |
| Multilateral |
| The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) Declaration Against Trafficking in Persons Particularly Women and Children declares the commitment of Member States to address the problem of trafficking in persons in the ASEAN region. |
| The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) Criminal Justice Responses to Trafficking in Persons – ASEAN Practitioner Guidelines outline best practice in the areas of investigation, prosecution and adjudication of trafficking in persons cases. The Guidelines also cover practical issues such as evidence, mutual legal assistance and extradition. |
| UN G.I.F.T – East Asia and the Pacific, Recommendations on an Effective Criminal Justice Response to Trafficking in Persons, recommendations adopted by participants to the UN G.I.F.T. Regional Workshop on Criminal Justice Responses to Trafficking in Persons, provide guidance to criminal justice practitioners on the criminal justice elements of trafficking in persons, including investigation, prosecution and adjudication of cases (pdf) |
| The Memorandum Of Understanding on Cooperation against Trafficking in Persons in the Greater Mekong Sub-region provides a framework for the six Greater Mekong Sub-region States to cooperate to address trafficking in persons. Subsequent Sub-Regional Plans of Action outline the national, bilateral and sub-regional initiatives signatory States commit to undertake. |
| The European Union and African States, Ouagadougou Action Plan to Combat Trafficking in Human Beings, Especially Women and Children establishes areas for States to address in dealing with the crime of human trafficking, including prevention and awareness raising, victim protection and assistance, legislative framework, policy development, law enforcement and cooperation and coordination. (pdf) |
| The Brussels Declaration on Preventing and Combating Trafficking in Human Beings, adopted by the European Conference on Preventing and Combating Trafficking in Human Beings – Global Challenge for the 21st Century calls on governments, international bodies and NGOs to take measures to intensify cooperation in the fields of prevention, victim protection and assistance and police and judicial cooperation. |
| Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe Permanent Council, Decision No. 557/Rev1 OSCE Action Plan to Combat Trafficking in Human Beings calls on States to incorporate best practice into their anti-trafficking policies. The Action Plan facilitates cooperation among participating States and recommends States engage with the international community’s anti-trafficking efforts. |
| Council of the European Union, EU Plan on best practices, standards and procedures for combating and preventing trafficking in human beings develops common standards and best practices to prevent and combat trafficking in persons. |
Organisation of American States, Conclusions and Recommendations of the First Meeting of National Authorities on Trafficking in Persons, calls on State’s to criminalise and prevent trafficking in accordance with the UN Trafficking Protocol provisions and urges States that have not yet ratified the Protocol to do so. Determines that a comprehensive approach to preventing trafficking in persons crime includes measures to prevent trafficking, prosecute its perpetrators, protect and assist its victims and strengthen international cooperation.
The Draft Final Document of the Second Meeting of National Authorities on Trafficking in Persons1 reaffirms member’s commitment and responsibility to counter human trafficking, outlines practices to strengthen and improve the effectiveness of their initiatives and calls on States to adopt and implement measures that take into account human rights, gender and age. |
|
|
A number of international agreements relevant to the trafficking in persons phenomenon precede the Convention against Transnational Organised Crime and its Trafficking Protocol. Whilst these instruments contribute to understanding the historical development of the current international legal framework, they are not central to the current framework and contemporary understanding of trafficking in persons crime. To review these treaties, see the United Nations Treaty Collection Chapter VII: Traffic in Persons database, available online (click here) |
|
^ Back to top
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
ASEAN Member States and the International Legal Framework around Trafficking in Persons
|
|
| The following table lists each ASEAN Member States status of ratification of a number of international treaties and conventions which form part of the international legal framework regulating trafficking in persons. The instrument abbreviations link to ratification and reservation information. The abbreviations are explained below the table, with links to the treaties and conventions. |
|
ASEAN Member States Status of Ratification of International Agreements relevant to Trafficking in Persons -
as at 25 August 2011 (instrument abbreviations link to current treaty status (either the United Nations Treaty Series or the International Labour Organisation database of international labour standards (ILOLEX)).
| Instrument |
ASEAN Member State (as at 25 August 2011) |
(instrument abbreviations link to status (UNTS)) |
Brunei |
Cambodia |
Indonesia |
Lao PDR |
Malaysia |
Myanmar |
Philippines |
Singapore |
Thailand |
Vietnam |
|
25 March
2008 (A) |
12 Dec
2005 (R) |
20 Apr
2009 (R) |
26 Sep
2003 (A) |
24 Sep
2004 (R) |
30 March
2004 (A) |
28 May
2002 (R) |
28 Aug
2007 (R) |
13 Dec
2000 (s) |
13 Dec
2000 (s) |
|
|
2 July
2007 (R) |
28 Sep
2009 (R) |
26 Sep
2003 (A) |
26 Feb
2009 (A) |
30 March
2004 (A) |
28 May
2002 (R) |
|
18 Dec
2001 (s) |
|
|
27 Dec
1995 (A) |
15 Oct
1992 (A) |
5 Sep
1990 (R) |
8 May
1991 (A) |
17 Feb
1995 (A) |
15 July
1991 (A) |
21 Aug
1990 (R) |
5 Oct
1995 (A) |
27 March
1992 (A) |
28 Feb
1990 (R) |
|
21 Nov
2006 (A) |
30 May
2002 (R) |
24 Sep
2001 (s) |
20 Sep
2006 (A) |
|
|
28 May
2002 (R) |
|
11 Jan
2006 (A) |
20 Dec
2001 (R) |
|
24 May
2006 (A) |
15 Oct
1992 (A) |
13 Sep
1984 (R) |
14 Aug
1981 (R) |
5 July
1995 (A) |
22 July
1997 (A) |
5 Aug
1981 (R) |
5 Oct
1995 (A) |
9 Aug
1985 (A) |
17 Feb
1982 (R) |
|
|
11 April
2002 (R) |
|
|
|
|
28 Dec
2000 (s) |
|
2 Oct
2000 (s) |
|
|
|
26 May
1992 (A) |
23 Feb
2006 (A) |
25 Sep
2009 (R) |
|
|
23 Oct
1986 (R) |
|
29 Oct
1996 (A) |
24 Sep
1982 (A) |
|
|
26 May
1992 (A) |
23 Feb
2006 (A) |
13 Feb
2007 (R) |
|
|
7 Jun
1974 (R) |
|
5 Sep
1999 (A) |
24 Sep
1982 (A) |
|
|
15 Oct
1992 (A) |
28 Oct
1998 (R) |
|
|
|
18 Jun
1986 (A) |
|
2 Oct
2007 (A) |
|
|
2 Dec
2008 (R) |
5 Sep
2007 (A) |
19 Sep
2006 (R) |
25 Sep
2009 (R) |
24 Sep
2008 (R) |
2 Dec
2005 (s) |
8 Nov
2006 (R) |
6 Nov
2009 (R) |
1 Mar 2011 (R) |
19 Aug
2009 (R) |
|
|
27 Sep
2004 (s) |
22 Sep
2004 (s) |
|
|
|
5 July
1995 (R) |
|
|
|
|
|
24 Feb
1969 (R) |
12 June
1950 (R) |
21 Jan
1964 (R) |
11 Nov
1957 (R) |
4 March
1955 (R) |
15 July
2005 (R) |
25 Oct
1965 (R) |
26 Feb
1969 (R) |
5 March
2007 (R) |
|
|
23 Aug
1999 (R) |
7 June
1999 (R) |
|
|
|
17 Nov
1960 (R) |
|
2 Dec
1969 (R) |
|
|
9 June
2008 (R) |
14 March
2006 (R) |
28 March
2000 (R) |
13 June
2005 (R) |
10 Nov
2005 (R) |
|
28 Nov
2000 (R) |
14 June
2001 (R) |
16 Feb
2001 (R) |
19 Dec
2000 (R) |
| |
Brunei |
Cambodia |
Indonesia |
Lao PDR |
Malaysia |
Myanmar |
Philippines |
Singapore |
Thailand |
Vietnam |
R = ratified; A = acceded to; s = signed
|
|
|
^ Back to top
_______________________________________________________________________________________________ |
|
1. The Second Meeting was held in Buenos Aires, Argentina, March 25-27 2009 (click here for online information).
2.
News media articles report that Indonesia’s House of Representatives ratified the UN Trafficking Protocol on 3 February 2009 . See, for example, Febriamy Hutapea, ‘House Targets Human Trade’, Jakarta Globe, 4 February 2009. This article is available online at http://www.thejakartaglobe.com/news/article/8488.html. As at 1 March 2009, this status has not been recorded in the online UN Treaty Collection Database of Depositary Notifications, see http://treaties.un.org/Pages/CNs.aspx. |
^ Back to top
_______________________________________________________________________________________________ |
|
| |
|